Evidence / Submission Issue
A relevant practice may exist, but the submitted evidence did not demonstrate it clearly enough.
Fixed-Scope Review After Your Assessment
Understand what your scorecard is telling you, investigate what likely sits behind the most important findings and decide what deserves attention before your next reassessment.
For companies with a published EcoVadis scorecard that need to understand the result, decide what to improve and plan the work before reassessment.
After the Scorecard Arrives
You can see the overall score, theme scores, strengths and Improvement Areas. What is harder to see is why the result took the shape it did, whether a weaker area reflects the evidence you submitted or the underlying management practice, and which improvements deserve attention first.
That becomes especially important when the result was lower than expected, one theme is much weaker than the others, the score fell compared with a previous assessment, or management wants a clear explanation of what happened and what the company should do next.
Understanding the Result
I investigate the most important findings and work out what type of issue they appear to reflect, as far as the available information allows.
A relevant practice may exist, but the submitted evidence did not demonstrate it clearly enough.
The finding appears to reflect a genuine weakness in the underlying policy, process, responsibility, implementation or monitoring.
Something exists, but it may not yet be broad, systematic or mature enough across the relevant organisation.
A specific factual or methodology issue may need clarification through the appropriate EcoVadis channel.
Meaningful improvement is worthwhile, but building the practice and the supporting evidence will require time.
What I Review
I use the scorecard, relevant assessment information and selected evidence to investigate the findings that matter most. You do not need to send every sustainability document your company owns.
I review the overall score, theme results, strengths, Improvement Areas, relevant 360 Watch information and previous scorecard changes where applicable to identify the patterns that deserve closer attention.
I use relevant questionnaire information, assessment scope, evidence lists and company context to understand what was submitted and what needs further investigation.
I review up to 10 priority evidence items to test the most likely explanations for the scorecard result, including scope, recency, coverage, implementation and whether the evidence demonstrates what was claimed.
The map connects important findings to the available evidence, the likely underlying issue, its importance, when it should be addressed and its priority.
Improvement Roadmap
The roadmap groups the work by when it makes sense to address it, so every Improvement Area does not become an equally urgent project.
Specific factual or evidence questions worth resolving while the previous assessment is still fresh.
Improvements that can be made relatively quickly because the underlying practice already exists.
Material improvements to the underlying policy, process or practice that require implementation and time to become demonstrable.
Important improvements that are unlikely to be the right immediate priority for the next reassessment cycle.
Existing strengths that should remain in place while attention moves to weaker areas.
The final brief explains the main scorecard findings, what the available evidence suggests sits behind them, which issues relate mainly to evidence and which require changes to the underlying practices, and what I recommend addressing before reassessment. It also includes a concise summary you can use with management.
How It Works
You provide the current scorecard and relevant assessment context. I confirm the materials needed to investigate the main questions raised by the result.
I analyse the scorecard pattern, compare themes and findings, and identify the questions that deserve deeper investigation.
I review the relevant questionnaire information and up to 10 priority evidence items to distinguish likely evidence weaknesses from gaps in the underlying policy, process or practice, and identify any questions that may need clarification.
I prepare the priorities and Scorecard Review Brief. In the live session, we work through the findings, challenge assumptions and turn them into clear company decisions.
For five working days after the review, you can ask questions about the findings and roadmap. This period is for understanding the review rather than reviewing unlimited newly created policies, measures or evidence.
Choosing the Right Route
The right route depends on whether you need help understanding what happened and deciding what to improve, or an answer to a specific question about the EcoVadis assessment itself.
You need to understand the broader pattern behind the result, investigate priority evidence, distinguish evidence problems from gaps in the underlying policy, process or practice and decide what to improve before reassessment.
You have a specific factual or methodology question, believe a particular assessment finding is factually inconsistent with the submitted material, or need clarification that only EcoVadis can provide about its own assessment.
Who Does What
The review investigates the findings that matter most rather than reviewing the entire sustainability management system or every document submitted.
Detailed evidence review is limited to up to 10 priority evidence items selected according to the scorecard pattern and the questions being investigated.
The available materials do not provide access to EcoVadis’ confidential evaluator reasoning. I distinguish between what the scorecard explicitly states, what the available evidence strongly supports and what remains my best-supported interpretation.
Implementing improvements to the underlying policies, processes and practices, writing missing policies, building programmes and completing the next reassessment sit outside the standard review.
The Scorecard Review is not an appeal service and does not represent the company in a formal EcoVadis inquiry.
EcoVadis remains responsible for its assessment and scoring decisions. The review does not guarantee a future score, badge or medal.
About Rutger
I first worked with EcoVadis from inside a company, where I helped coordinate successive assessments across different functions. Over time, my former company progressed from Silver to Gold to Platinum.
I now combine that experience with around 15 years in sustainability, an MSc in Strategic Sustainable Development and my work as an EcoVadis Solutions Practitioner to help other companies understand their results, investigate important weaknesses and make clearer improvement decisions.
“Rutger is an excellent sustainability professional with extensive expertise in sustainability management and EcoVadis.”
Common Questions
The questions below cover timing, materials, evidence review, what you receive, EcoVadis questions, implementation, price and the limits of scorecard interpretation.
The review is most useful soon after the scorecard is published, while the assessment is still fresh, or sufficiently before the next reassessment that your company has time to implement meaningful improvements.
If a new reassessment questionnaire is already open and your main need is help navigating the active assessment, EcoVadis Assessment Support may be the better service.
The core material is your current EcoVadis scorecard.
Depending on the questions raised by the result, I may also request a previous scorecard, questionnaire or export, Industry Risk Profile, evidence list, selected submitted documents, assessed entity information and relevant company context.
You do not need to send every sustainability document your company owns.
The service includes detailed review of up to 10 priority evidence items.
I select these based on the scorecard pattern and the questions raised by the result. The purpose is to test the most likely explanations behind the result rather than review the entire sustainability management system.
You receive a concise Scorecard Review Brief explaining the main findings, what the available evidence suggests sits behind them, which issues relate mainly to evidence and which require changes to the underlying policy, process or practice, and what I recommend addressing before reassessment.
The review also uses a Scorecard Diagnostic Map to connect important findings to likely underlying issues and priorities.
The core review is completed over approximately 10 working days from receipt of the complete review materials.
The Scorecard Review Brief and 90-minute live session are followed by five working days in which you can ask questions about the findings and roadmap.
The DYS Scorecard Review helps you understand the broader result, investigates priority evidence, distinguishes evidence weaknesses from gaps in the underlying policy, process or practice and builds a prioritised improvement roadmap.
An appropriate EcoVadis channel may be better for a specific factual or methodology question, or where your company believes a particular assessment finding is factually inconsistent with the material that was submitted.
No. The Scorecard Review explains the findings and prioritises the work.
Your company remains responsible for implementing improvements, updating policies, measures and KPIs, assigning internal owners and preparing the eventual reassessment.
The EcoVadis Scorecard Review costs €3,250 excluding VAT.
Payment is normally due on acceptance or commencement, subject to reasonable company procurement requirements.
The review cannot reconstruct EcoVadis’ confidential evaluator reasoning or explain every score point with certainty.
I distinguish between what EcoVadis explicitly states, what the supporting materials strongly suggest and what remains an informed hypothesis.
Specific factual disputes should be raised through the appropriate EcoVadis channel.
No. The review identifies priorities and provides a structured basis for improvement, but EcoVadis remains responsible for future assessment and scoring decisions.
No future score, badge or medal can be guaranteed.
30-Minute Fit Call
Tell me when the scorecard was published, what raised the biggest questions and when you expect to reassess. I will review the information before we speak. After submitting the form, you can choose a time for a 30-minute fit call.

Practical EcoVadis guidance, tools and support.
© 2026 Double Your Sustainability